Thursday, May 5, 2011

To David



There seems to be a problem with posting this comment to you. (Too Long)




This nation is seriously ill!


When this nation is so blood thirsty for Bin Laden death photos and burial video that it cares not the about the inciting repercussions, only its own drooling satisfaction of/for revenge and the Bush War Criminals in John Wayne quick draw fashion rally to the value of torture as the contributing factor in Bin Laden’s demise; we bear witness, yet again, to their attempts to justify their criminality as they bolster themselves from what will come to pass as the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts wind down, a confrontation of the USA with The Geneva Conventions and War Criminal Proceedings, even trials in absentia. 


Wikileaks has already revealed our interference and manipulations against Spain’s Prosecutor Garzon on this matter.


 That effort is not done and the Garzon path to the Hague, while complicated is not lost; in fact it gains strength and support abroad and with a very accomplished team within the USA. When war is over; then it hits the fan. The fan is whirling and America will have to learn someday that we are not above the law and that we are not free to do anything we damn well please. 


That attitude and arrogance is characteristic, always present in criminal acts, be thmething Jey those of the common street criminal or those of the corporate and Government “elite”. 


The Bush administration knew full well that it was in the wrong, was prepared to ignore the Geneva Conventions as it was prepared to consign our Constitution to the dumpster as an obsolete, irrelevant document of our past. They had legal staff prepare rationale of evasion of the law, a criminal act in and of itself. 


Stop and ask yourself: “What rights to we have left”. Answer: only the 2nd Amendment right to “Keep and Bears Arms” currently has full force after the DC Case. Given the hateful nature of our discourse; what does that say for the future? 


Are we so different and demoralized that further economic deterioration, the deliberate undoing of “The New Deal”, the equalization of rights, racial and women’s, the open assault on the Middle Class and Unions, Public Employees and factory workers, on the future of our young, that we will not rise up as folks have along the shores of Northern Africa? I think not!


Time and desperation are the sires of revolution and it might do Americans well to revisit soFK said: “Those who make peaceful evolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable>” Off course David; there will always be those fools who believe the media: “That it can’t happen here.”

To David

There seems to be a problem with posting this comment to you.




This nation is seriously ill!


When this nation is so blood thirsty for Bin Laden death photos and burial video that it cares not the about the inciting repercussions, only its own drooling satisfaction of/for revenge and the Bush War Criminals in John Wayne quick draw fashion rally to the value of torture as the contributing factor in Bin Laden’s demise; we bear witness, yet again, to their attempts to justify their criminality as they bolster themselves from what will come to pass as the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts wind down, a confrontation of the USA with The Geneva Conventions and War Criminal Proceedings, even trials in absentia. 


Wikileaks has already revealed our interference and manipulations against Spain’s Prosecutor Garzon on this matter.


 That effort is not done and the Garzon path to the Hague, while complicated is not lost; in fact it gains strength and support abroad and with a very accomplished team within the USA. When war is over; then it hits the fan. The fan is whirling and America will have to learn someday that we are not above the law and that we are not free to do anything we damn well please. 


That attitude and arrogance is characteristic, always present in criminal acts, be thmething Jey those of the common street criminal or those of the corporate and Government “elite”. 


The Bush administration knew full well that it was in the wrong, was prepared to ignore the Geneva Conventions as it was prepared to consign our Constitution to the dumpster as an obsolete, irrelevant document of our past. They had legal staff prepare rationale of evasion of the law, a criminal act in and of itself. 


Stop and ask yourself: “What rights to we have left”. Answer: only the 2nd Amendment right to “Keep and Bears Arms” currently has full force after the DC Case. Given the hateful nature of our discourse; what does that say for the future? 


Are we so different and demoralized that further economic deterioration, the deliberate undoing of “The New Deal”, the equalization of rights, racial and women’s, the open assault on the Middle Class and Unions, Public Employees and factory workers, on the future of our young, that we will not rise up as folks have along the shores of Northern Africa? I think not!


Time and desperation are the sires of revolution and it might do Americans well to revisit soFK said: “Those who make peaceful evolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable>” Off course David; there will always be those fools who believe the media: “That it can’t happen here.”

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

The Wheels May Be Coming Off But Listen For The Sound Of Over Taxed Shredders And Click Of Zippos Opening:

The Wheels May Be Coming Off But Listen For The Sound Of Over Taxed Shredders And Click Of Zippos Opening:


Secure The Evidence — NOW !

This Point Is Well Made And Well Taken!

August 11, 2008 – 9:18 am

Stephen P. Pizzo


The Bush administration’s days are numbered. That’s both a good and bad news story.


The good news is we are now less than six months away from the end of America’s longest nightmare.


The bad news is we have less than six months for congress and the courts to insure that, when these guys leave Washington on Jan 21, 2009, they leave behind an accurate and complete historical record.


George W. Bush, unpopular now in the extreme, comforts himself with the oft repeated hope that “history will vindicate our policies.”


Well, history can only vindicate — or condemn — if it has a complete historical record to work from. And as the days tick down to the end of this administration’s reign, it has become increasingly obvious that there’s a lot they have not wanted us to know, have not allowed us to know and are highly unlikely to let us know — unless the evidence is secured before it can be hidden behind the walls of a yet-to-be built Bush Library, spirited away by individual administration officials or — most likely — simply deleted, shredded and burned. (I know because I’ve been here before,)


I’m not going to waste the reader’s time listing all the high crimes and misdemeanors this bunch is now suspected of having committed over its eight years in power. (Here’s an excellent list though) Suffice it to say that they have made the Nixon administration’s look like choir boys and girls by comparison. But at least in case of the Nixon gang, Congress and the Supreme Court secured the relevant evidence, including the all-revealing Oval Office tapes.


And believe me, the Bushies noticed what happens when the evidence of crimes is left laying around rather than destroyed. Nixon later said his greatest regret was not destroying those tapes when he had the chance.


Who knows … maybe all us finger-pointers and accusers have been wrong all along. Maybe the Bush folk actually didn’t break laws at all. Who knows… anything is possible. And, if that can be proven, I will be the first one to admit I was wrong.


But before I — or history — can reach such a conclusion, we need a complete historical record.


Unfortunately this Democratic-controlled congress is so steeped in political game-playing aimed at November elections, they are not about to engage in anything that even approaches fulfilling their constitutional obligations, vis a vie impeachment or real hearings.


But one thing Congress could and should do, and do immediately, is compile a detailed list of every document the administration has refused to turn over on the grounds of executive privilege. Then issue individual subpoenas for each document as well as blanket subpoenas for all documents “disclosed and undisclosed,” covering specific areas of investigation; the war, the politicization of Dept. of Justice, energy policy meetings, Katrina response, etc.


Of course, if we’ve learned anything over the past couple of years it’s that we cannot depend on the Democrats in Congress to show much backbone. Which is why the courts need to get involved, and fast? Public interest legal groups, on both the right and left, have an obligation to their own principles and to history to turn their full attentions to preserving the complete documentary history of this administration.


Groups usually on the opposite sides of issues, should join forces on this one. They should get to federal court and make the case that this administration’s public record of either refusing to turn over documents, and refusing to testify under oath and of even destroying electronic documents (such as five million White House emails) establishes a prima facia case in favor of a court injunction against the destruction or removal from government offices of the following records be they physical or virtual:


All:

* - schedules,
* - meetings and meeting notes.
* - official memos,
* - official files,
* - official emails sent and/or received from any domain.
* - logs, including but not limited to, phone logs, visitor logs, Secret Service logs and official aircraft logs.
* - employment records, including interview notes and internal memos on would-be hires.
* - contracts, no bid and otherwise, including, but not limited to, all related notes, memos and emails


This federal court injunction must apply, not only to the White House, but to all and each cabinet-level agencies as well as the CIA, NSA, Office of Special Operations. (And, since it is public knowledge that Vice President, Dick Cheney, maintains his own secure document trove in his office, this injunction should make particular note of that safe as well. )


Sure, I know there are already laws against public officials removing or destroying official documents. But relying on those laws would be a serious mistake. This administration has shown many times that when an existing law or regulation gets in the way of their agenda, needs or schemes, the President simply issues an executive order that neuters the troublesome rule or law.


In this case all Bush would have do come early January is issue an executive order directing “all Executive Branch offices, agencies and employees to clear your files of any extraneous materials.” Such an order would provide all the legal cover needed for wholesale document destruction.


Federal court injunctions ordering all executive branch employees, including the President and Vice President, to secure all documents, would add a layer of legal risk — obstruction of justice — that George could not simply wipe away with a stroke of the Presidential pen.


Look, I understand none of this legal-beagle activity is as satisfying or as sexy as a juicy public impeachment. But, barring George or Dick being caught red-handed waterboarding Nancy Pelosi on the floor of the House, impeachment is simply not going to happen.


So, unless something else is done to secure the 8-year documentary record of this administration — or at least what’s left of it — Bush, Cheney and their army of sycophant accomplices will leave office, having wiped their fingerprints clean from the longest list of suspected crimes in office in American history.


From now on when you close your eyes at night, listen and you can almost imagine you hear that sound of hundreds of industrial-strength shredders warming up. It’s up to us to assure they are not used to between now and January to destroy the evidence needed to prove, or disprove, the suspicion that the Bush administration has been the most subversive and lawless in American history.


Monday, August 11, 2008

The Georgian Issue: All Sides!

The Georgian Issue: All Sides!



LONDON (Reuters) - Georgia made a strategic miscalculation in trying to rapidly overrun South Ossetia, and as a result has probably lost the region for good, regional analysts say.

While Russian-backed separatists in the breakaway Georgian region helped provoke Georgia into action, it was the belief that its troops could secure a lightning victory that underpinned Georgia's decision to attack.

"The Georgians rolled the dice and they lost," said Michael Denison, an expert in Russian and Eurasian affairs at Chatham House, a London-based security think tank.

"It was not an unreasonable calculation to go for a rapid win, but in the end it was a miscalculation."

Georgia, which has several restless regions within its territory, has managed to quell low-level insurgencies on its turf in recent years -- notably in the Kodori Gorge and the Adjara region -- without provoking Russian reaction.

It calculated that, with the recent change of leadership in Moscow and by timing the attack to coincide with the opening of the Olympics, it could secure a quick and relatively trouble-free victory.

"The capital Tskhinvali is relatively small, no more than around 25,000 people, and they probably thought they could just take it and be done," said Denison.

"They may have calculated that some people would leave the region and flee north to North Ossetia, but the rest would stay and the problem would basically be resolved."

In hindsight, he said, the Georgians should have thought about blocking or blowing up the Roki Tunnel that links South Ossetia to Russia and gave Russian forces access to the region. But the Georgians needed to keep the tunnel open so that South Ossetians could escape north.

Denison and others note that South Ossetia's separatists had been provoking Georgia for some time, probably counting on Russia to come to their aid if needed.

"The Russians have been provoking for a long time and I don't doubt that they stoked up the separatists to start attacking," said Bruce George, a British member of parliament with a long-term association with Georgia.

"At the same time if you embark on a war, as the Georgians did, you have to work out what the consequences will be. It was inevitable that the Russians would react very heavily... and at this stage it seems uncertain that they will stop."

Denison, who was last in South Ossetia a few months ago, said Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's assertion that it was now very unlikely South Ossetia would ever be integrated into Georgia had all but sealed the region's fate.

"If the Russians hadn't intervened and Georgia had taken over, some South Ossetians would have fled, but most probably would have been okay, and South Ossetia probably would have been better off economically and culturally.

"As it is, now they are looking at being a small outpost on the southern reaches of Russia."

“U.S. suggests Russia wants "regime change" in Georgia; I suggest that in addition to that factor; the Russians are sending a signal that they are prepared to act against “America’s stated interests” as a payback for our role in Kosovo and as a warning regarding Iran.

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United States suggested on Sunday that Russia was interested in "regime change" in Georgia after Moscow rejected Tbilisi's offer of a cease-fire in the separatist enclave of South Ossetia.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice that the president of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili "must go," the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Zalmay Khalilzad, told the Security Council.

Khalilzad then looked straight at Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin and asked if Moscow was looking for "regime change."

"Is the goal of the Russian Federation to change the leadership of Georgia?" he said.

Churkin did not directly address the question but said there are leaders who "become an obstacle."

"Sometimes those leaders need to contemplate how useful they have become to their people," he told reporters later.

"Regime change is purely an American invention," he said. "We're all for democracy in Georgia."

Russian troops took the capital of South Ossetia earlier after a three-day battle as Georgian forces retreated and the Tbilisi government offered a cease-fire and talks. Continued...

Cheney: "Russian aggression must not go unanswered" BEIJING (Reuters) - Vice President Dick Cheney called Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili to express U.S. solidarity in the conflict with Russia and told him "Russian aggression must not go unanswered," the vice president's office said on Monday.

"The vice president expressed the United States' solidarity with the Georgian people and their democratically elected government in the face of this threat to Georgia's sovereignty and territorial integrity," Cheney's office said in a statement.

It said Cheney, in a phone call on Sunday, told Saakashvili that "Russian aggression must not go unanswered, and that its continuation would have serious consequences for its relations with the United States, as well as the broader international community."

Cheney had remained in the United States while U.S. President George W. Bush, who spoke to Saakashvili earlier, was attending the Beijing Olympics.

Cheney's office released the statement as Georgia, a U.S. ally, offered Russia a ceasefire and peace talks after pulling troops back from rebel South Ossetia's capital, and mediators began a mission to end the internationally condemned fighting.

Some fighting still gripped parts of the Caucasus region, however, and Russia demanded an unconditional Georgian withdrawal.

Factbox-What Is Georgia's Rebel South Ossetia Region?

Moscow - Russia launched airstrikes yesterday deep inside Georgia and mobilized columns of tanks after Georgian forces embarked on a major offensive to reassert control over South Ossetia, a separatist province. Political leaders on both sides said that war had begun. The United States, an ally of Georgia, and other governments appealed for a cease-fire.

Georgian Army units quickly seized Tskhinvali, capital of the mountainous province, Georgian officials said.

But large numbers of Russian tanks appeared to be moving against them there. Russian television showed what was described as a Georgian armored vehicle burning on the city's streets. Local officials reported large numbers of civilians killed. Russian officials said that more than 10 of their troops had died.

Georgia, a former Soviet republic, became independent after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. South Ossetia then fought a war to break away from Georgia and has had de facto independence since 1992.

The province is dominated by an ethnic Ossetian population, many of whom have taken Russian citizenship. South Ossetia has received support from Russia, which is suspicious of Georgia's close links with the United States and its bid to join NATO.

Georgia's American-educated president, Mikhail Saakashvili, has made recovery of South Ossetia and another breakaway region, Abkhazia, a top priority.

"A full-scale aggression has been launched against Georgia," Saakashvili declared in a televised statement. He announced a full military mobilization, with reservists being called into action.

Georgian officials also said they would recall troops in Iraq to bolster forces against the Russians.

In an interview with CNN, Saakashvili called for unspecified US support for Georgia, comparing the situation to Soviet crackdowns in places such as Czechoslovakia and Afghanistan.

"This is not about a tiny separatist area inside Georgia," he said. ". . . This is not about Georgia anymore. It is about America, its values."

President Bush discussed the crisis with Prime Minister Vladimir Putin of Russia in Beijing, where both were attending the opening ceremonies of the Summer Olympics, US officials said. Putin told Bush that "war has started today in South Ossetia," according to Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov.

The Bush administration offered strongly worded backing for Georgia but avoided any mention of possible military assistance. In Beijing, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said "the United States supports Georgia's territorial integrity and we call for an immediate cease-fire."

The administration was urging "all parties - Georgians, South Ossetians and Russians - to deescalate the tension and avoid conflict," Perino said.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice - who spoke several times by telephone with her Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov - was more specific.

"We call on Russia to cease attacks on Georgia by aircraft and missiles, respect Georgia's territorial integrity, and withdraw its ground combat forces from Georgian soil," her statement said.

The two major party presidential candidates - Senator Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois, and Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona - called separately for the United Nations Security Council to help end the violence.

The administration and the European Union agreed to send mediators, an effort in which France appeared to take the lead. France, which currently holds the rotating residency of the European Union, issued a communiqué saying that envoys would be sent to Georgia from the EU, the United States, and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

About 130 US military and civilian personnel are currently in Georgia, where they are training Georgian troops for deployment to Iraq as part of the multinational force there. US military officials in Baghdad said they had received no official word that half of Georgia's 2,000-troop contingent was being called home from Iraq, despite statements from Tblisi.

In New York, Georgia requested an emergency session of the UN Security Council to try to secure a cessation of hostilities and to press Russia to withdraw its military forces. The 15-nation council struggled unsuccessfully in a closed-door session to fashion a statement calling for an end to the fighting in South Ossetia, but the United States and Russian remained deadlocked over wording.

Russia's UN ambassador, Vitaly Churkin, said that Russia was compelled to intervene to protect Russian citizens from attacks by Georgian forces and that those responsible for violence would be held accountable. He said that Georgia's actions "calls into question the viability of Georgia as a state, their viability as a responsible member of the world community."

The two sides have long skirmished along the unofficial border between Georgia and the province of South Ossetia, where Russia has maintained a force of soldiers who are officially peacekeepers, but who Georgians see as allies of the separatists.

Georgian officials said their offensive was triggered early Friday after separatists continued to shell Georgian villages following the announcement of a unilateral cease-fire by Saakashvili on Thursday.

Television images showed Georgian rockets firing into the night sky. Reporters in Tskhinvali said many houses were engulfed in flames, a hospital was destroyed, and a university was on fire. One Russian peacekeeper told Interfax, the Russian news agency, that the city was "practically destroyed."

More than 10 Russian peacekeepers have been killed, and about 30 have been wounded in fighting in Tskhinvali, Colonel Igor Konashenkov, aide to the commander in chief of the Russian Ground Forces, told the Russian news agency Interfax.

Estimates of civilian casualties from the separatist government ran as high as 1,400. Civilians from South Ossetia were flooding to the border with Russia, according to news reports. Russian media said that paramilitary fighters were also streaming across the border from Russia, including from North Ossetia, a Russian republic that shares ethnic ties with the South Ossetians.

President Dmitry Medvedev of Russia, facing his first major crisis since coming to office in May, called an emergency meeting of Russia's national security council.

"We will not tolerate the death of our citizens," Medvedev said at the meeting. "Those guilty will receive due punishment."

War in the Caucasus: Towards a Broader Russia-US Military Confrontation?


Does anyone remember the Woodrow Wilson Principle of : “Self-Determination”?

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

MoveOn.org: Impeachment (If Not Now, When?)


MoveOn.org: Impeachment (If Not Now, When?)



Moveon.Org Has A Lot Of Questions To Answer For Its Members If Expects To Keep Its Membership And Support!



And I am one of those members who will not ante up another dollar or make a move to support or join another street action in Washington DC until they do so.



I will not, as of this day, even post an announcement or a request from MoveOn until our questions are answered.



1) What is the organization’s official position on Impeachment?



(If not now, when?) ( are you going to continue burying the issue in confusing survey forms, the dating of which has given rise to the wide spread resurfacing of this issue as they seem to be little more than lazy Performa recycling of previous documents.) I am not prepared to pay for that form of advocacy.



2) Given the fact that the House Committee on the Judiciary has already conducted one hearing on the efforts of Mr. Kucinich and his supporters nationwide; is MoveOn prepared to join the battle and make a real difference.



An unwillingness or failure to do so would say to me that MoveOn is no longer an advocacy organization of the people but a submissive collaborator and wholly owned subsidiary of the Pelosi-Reid Democratic leadership.



3) Has MoveOn bought into the “spin lines” that it’s too late to do anything now, and that there are other things more important at the moment than the restoration of Constitutional Law in this land and Executive Accountability, (like doing anything controversial might endanger the election of Democrats in November regardless of whether they are worthy of election or reelection)?



4) Is MoveOn prepared to explore or support the exploration of the Suskind allegations?



5) Is MoveOn prepared to act on the clear fact that this administration has engaged in Torture, contrary to our own laws and in total arrogance and defiance of The Geneva Conventions?



6) Has MoveOn become a co-opted organization, co-opted by the Democratic Party leadership to the point where it will sit out any issue that the leadership deems to be uncomfortable and represent that position as the will of the membership of MoveOn as determined by survey techniques designed to provide cover for the leadership of the organization while it enjoys the fruits of the members donations?



These questions need and deserve candid “no spin” responses. In Google groups and organizations across America serious questions are being raised as to the value and integrity of MoveOn. When Members raise such questions; something is very wrong; trust has been lost.

I am not pleased to have to raise these matters in such a public forum.


But when you do not answer my email inquiries and I get a telephone run around after having to do some serious searching even to initiate some calls; I have no other choice.

Saturday, August 2, 2008

Wal-Mart Enters The Political Arena With Political Intimidation Of Employees!



Wal-Mart Enters The Political Arena With Political Intimidation Of Employees!


We couldn't believe the front page of today's Wall Street Journal. Have you seen it?


It’s Right Here: Wal-Mart Warns of Democratic Win - WSJ.com


http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB121755649066303381.html


Wal-Mart has been threatening employees to not vote for pro-worker candidates like Barack Obama in November because they support the Employee Free Choice Act. If passed, the bill would make it easier to form unions in stores like Wal-Mart.


Telling employees how to vote in a U.S. election is not only morally reprehensible, it's potentially illegal.


So we’re starting a petition to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), asking for an investigation into Wal-Mart’s electioneering. Can you sign on?


Ask the Federal Election Committee to investigate Wal-Mart’s potentially illegal intimidation.


Wal-Mart is stretching the bounds of legality with these outrageous tactics – it's illegal for companies to advocate for political candidates to hourly employees. Here’s how one Wal-Mart worker described the meeting:


"The meeting leader said, 'I am not telling you how to vote, but if the Democrats win, this bill will pass and you won't have a vote on whether you want a union,'" said a Wal-Mart customer-service supervisor from Missouri. "I am not a stupid person. They were telling me how to vote," she said.


Unfortunately for Wal-Mart workers, intimidation is par for the course at the world’s largest employer.


Wal-Mart threatens workers who try to form a union, flying in a unionbusting team any time there's a whiff of union activity. Workers at Wal-Mart face threats, propaganda, discrimination, intimidation, and even firings in retaliation for trying to improve their lives and working conditions.


But this is a new low – one that goes to the very core principles of our democracy.


We need to show Wal-Mart – and other anti-union companies – that this kind of behavior will not be tolerated. Ask the FEC to immediately investigate if Wal-Mart broke any laws.



All of America’s workers have the right to freely decide whom to vote for independent of employer pressure and intimidation. And all of America’s workers should have ability to form a union free of employer pressure and intimidation.


Please forward this message to friends and family and let them know what's going on. Thank you for helping us call attention to this latest outrage.


Ask the Federal Election Commission to investigate Wal-Mart’s electioneering.


Sign on to our petition to the FEC!


Sincerely,

Liz Cattaneo
American Rights at Work
www.AmericanRightsatWork.org


http://action.walmartwatch.com/page/s/voters


Let’s Have It All:


Wal-Mart denies that it told employees how to vote
The Associated Press - Aug 1, 2008
The Wall Street Journal cited about a dozen unidentified Wal-Mart employees who had attended such meetings in seven states as saying they were told that ...


Wal-Mart Watch Responds to 'Wal-Mart Warns of Democratic Win' FOXBusiness


Wal-Mart denies election meddling Washington Times


Wal-Mart denies vote coercion Toronto Star


Reuters - Huffington Post


all 445 news articles

Thursday, July 17, 2008

World Can’t Wait Alert and Pelosi Site Taken Down Today Over Women’s Issue

World Can’t Wait Alert and Pelosi Site Taken Down Today Over Women’s Issue

World Can’t Wait | http://www.worldcantwait.org

Earlier this week, when we heard that protest groups in Denver are not planning one march against the occupation of Iraq and the potential attack on Iran, we wrote this. I'm inviting you to sign on to the letter here.

16 July 2008: In six weeks, the Democrats meet in Denver.



As recent news makes clear, an attack on Iran could happen before the election, driving the Bush Agenda into the next administration, no matter who the president is.



Who will stop an attack on Iran?



Not the Democrats who secretly authorized military operations George Bush already has underway inside Iran. Not the Democratic leaders - including Senator Obama - who insist, again and again, that "all options" remain on the table for military action against Iran, including the use of nuclear weapons!

Not the Democrats who, in their majority, including Obama, not only sanctioned retroactive immunity for the large telecom companies who went along with Bush and spied on people, but have given them prospective immunity in expanded government spying.



This war now belongs to the Democrats no less than the Republicans. If it is left to McCain and Obama, the occupation will continue for years. It was wrong to go into Iraq, it's wrong to stay in Iraq, it's wrong not to get out now!



If there is not a strong showing from the anti-war movement against this whole direction outside the convention, it will signal those who make war and the victims of these wars around the world that the people of this country will go along with continued occupation, with McCain or Obama sending many more troops to Afghanistan, and with threats to Iran. The Bush regime promised a war to last generations. Are we against this, or not?



The anti-war movement must set a standard of resistance, not accommodate what is intolerable. Only the people - not the politicians - can force open debate over why the U.S. occupation must end now. Only we can act on our convictions, letting others know that an end to the illegal, unjust and immoral wars and occupations will not happen without massive mobilization of the people, and that putting all your hopes and energies into the elections will not bring the change millions desire.



Some people say protest does not work. They are WRONG! What does not work is passivity in the face of a government being more widely exposed as committing war crimes and a public increasingly sickened by what is being done in their name. If the anti-war movement was so ineffectual why did the New York Times have to call it the "other superpower"?



Whether one plans on voting for Obama or not, we all must be in the streets making our clear opposition to torture, bloody occupations and any new war against Iran vividly clear. People are traveling the country to campaign for Obama. With a strong call from the anti-war movement, some will be willing to bring an anti-war message to Denver.


Local Denver activists have gone to court for permits for political protest outside the convention, and have permits for nearby parks. Recreate68 plans a march against the war on Sunday August 24, the day before the convention starts. The Alliance for Real Democracy, another coalition, is currently not planning to join this march.


Whatever differences exist, they pale in comparison to the responsibility those of us who are not at peace with being at war have to stop the US occupation of the Middle East. The world needs to see us in the streets in Denver, marching together on the eve of the convention opening.



If you're concerned this protest will be too small, you're not alone. The people in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan & Pakistan whose lives may be lost to further US aggression share that concern. It is the responsibility of those of us who know the devastation and misery the continued occupation of Iraq and an attack on Iran would bring to the world to struggle to bring many more forward to participate in this.



This is a call to MARCH together with the demand Stop the war in Iraq/Afghanistan, and Stop an Attack on Iran! You could have separate rallies and speakers at different sites in the park, but call out the many thousands of people to march together.



We will join with others in mobilizing everyone who has ever been against this war, and all those who know in their hearts this is wrong, to be in the streets of Denver, standing with the people of the world and refusing to be party to these wars.

We the undersigned will do all we can to get people to Denver to participate.



Missy Beattie, Elaine Brower, Larry Everest, Ron Kovic, Dennis Loo, Cynthia McKinney, Dede Miller, Cindy Sheehan, David Swanson, Debra Sweet, Sunsara Taylor,Kevin Zeese Add your name to the letter here.

SIGN UP to join World Can't Wait in Denver August 23-28

A Digg story that contained a link to a statement on the website of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi reached the front page this morning, apparently sending so much traffic to Pelosi's site that it crashed completely.

The blog entry was a comment on a rule reportedly being drafted by the Bush administration's Department of Health and Human Services. The rule would threaten to cut funding to medical care providers which refused to hire personnel who preferred not to perform abortions for religious or moral reasons.

Commentators have noted that the proposal's definition of abortion is so broad that it could include, as the Times' Countdown to Crawford blog wrote, "multiple forms of contraception, including some birth control pills, IUDs and emergency 'morning after' contraception." (C2C also posted about this situation).

Pelosi's statement, reproduced here, reads in part:

If the Administration goes through with this draft proposal, it will launch a dangerous assault on womens' health.

The majority of Americans oppose this out of touch position that redefines contraception as abortion and represents a sustained pattern of the Bush Administration to reject medical and sound science in favor of a misguided ideology that has no place in our government.

Digg can send thousands of visitors to a website at a time, a level of traffic concentration that can bring down even large and relatively well-established sites. It's probable that the Speaker.gov site rarely gets spikes of this size, and so -- like many websites that get Dugg, Drudged, Slashdotted or even Yahoo! Buzzed -- they'll have to learn the hard way that there's no such thing as too much bandwidth.

When I called Pelosi's office, the spokesperson I talked to did not know there was a problem with the site. When he tried to load it himself, it did not come up. He said he'd look into it and call back.

UPDATE (12:19 p.m.): The site appears to be back up and running.